This is just a funny comic I found earlier, you may have to open it in a new window if it is too small to read:
So after talking with people about the appointment on Sat. and telling them our odds (about 50%) we always seem to get on the discussion of how many to put back. Usually the typical amount is 2, and most of the time you end up with a singleton (just 1 baby). Well, if you put back 3 wouldn't your odds be better than just the 50%? And, of the 3 that you put back what would REALLY be the odds of having all 3 take? What maybe 5%? Of that 5% how many are actually going to make it to delivery (vanishing twin syndrome) maybe 1%? We were just talking about it and although it would be really tough to have twins (or triplets) I really don't think I could face the fact of spending $13k and having NOTHING? So my question to you all is....knowing ALL the risks (NICU, premature babies, pregnancy complications, ect) how many would you REALISTICALLY put back???
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
1,2,3?
Posted by
Sara
at
10:18 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
I think I'd really talk to your Dr. about it. I know a lot of countries won't even consider putting 3 in, but a lot of women in America here have found a lot of success with 3.
I say, do what you feel is right! I think I'd probably only put in 2, because what if they split! Then you have 6! lol.
Post a Comment